Mower path assistance system

ABSTRACT

A mower path assistance system to encircle an obstacle projecting from a ground surface, including a barrier mat formed with a barrier mat aperture enclosed by the barrier mat and having a barrier mat aperture diameter, a perimeter edge, and a barrier mat installation slit extending from the perimeter edge to the barrier mat aperture, wherein the barrier mat is deformable around the barrier mat installation slit to create a pathway having a pathway width through which the obstacle may pass from the perimeter to the barrier mat aperture. The barrier mat has a plurality of edges with axes that intersect at obtuse angles.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation application of U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 15/865,863, filed on Jan. 9, 2018, all of which areincorporated by reference as if completely written herein.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates to the field of mower path assistancesystem, particular to a system that encircles an obstacle projectingfrom a ground surface

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to methods and devices forcreating a safe working environment around vertical projections andobstructions and for preventing vegetation. More particularly, theinvention is directed to methods and devices for covering the groundarea immediately surrounding such projections to eliminate the need forthe mower to perform a full 360 circle around the projection andmaintain a substantially parallel mowing path, and reduce the growth ofvegetation, while reducing the risks associated with mowing near suchobstructions. Fire hydrants, mail box posts, fence posts, guy wires, andother similar ground-anchored structures generally require a mower todeviate from a traditional mower path consisting largely of parallelopposed direction mowing paths. Such deviations, particularly when theyrequire the mower to slow down and make a full 360 degree circle aroundan obstacle, significantly reduce the efficiency of mowing projectadding significant time and danger associated from such maneuvers. Afterall, the natural tendency is to try to mow as close to the obstructionas practical so as to reduce the amount of post-mowing trimming that isrequired. Obviously, trying to mow within inches of an obstruction whilemoving at a high speed is prone for accidents, which can be lifethreatening. Further, such obstacles are often located in areas wherevegetation grows around the base of the structure. Vegetation around theground-anchored structures must routinely be maintained to prevent theovergrowth of vegetation. Due to the above problems associated withvegetation growth around ground-anchored structures, routine maintenancemust be performed to control the growth, which generally consists of asecondary step of trimming around the obstacle after mowing around theobstacle. There are several problems associated with these prior artmethods for controlling vegetation around the ground-anchoredstructures. The secondary step of trimming around the ground-anchoredstructure to control vegetation growth results in substantial labor andother costs, as does the deviation from the parallel path mowing plan.In addition, damage can be caused to the structures themselves or tomower and equipment which collides with the ground-anchored structureswhich may be partially concealed by vegetation growth. The cost ofrepairing or replacing mowers due to damage caused by concealedground-anchored structures can be substantial, as is the risk of injury.Additionally, problems are also encountered by the use of herbicides tocontrol vegetation around such obstacles. The harmful chemicals mayresult in environmental damages and concern and potentially getting tothe ground water. Herbicides may also be corrosive and can cause damageto the ground-anchored structures. The present invention provides abarrier system and method to reduce vegetation growth around posts, guywires, trees, and other lawn obstacles and reduce vegetation growtharound such projections, while improving mower safety.

SUMMARY OF INVENTION

A mower path assistance system to encircle an obstacle projecting from aground surface, including a barrier mat formed with a barrier mataperture enclosed by the barrier mat and having a barrier mat aperturediameter, a perimeter edge, and a barrier mat installation slitextending from the perimeter edge to the barrier mat aperture, whereinthe barrier mat is deformable around the barrier mat installation slitto create a pathway having a pathway width through which the obstaclemay pass from the perimeter to the barrier mat aperture. The barrier mathas a plurality of edges with axes that intersect at obtuse angles.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Without limiting the scope of the mower path assistance system asclaimed below and referring now to the drawings and figures:

FIG. 1 is an isometric view of an embodiment of a mower path assistancesystem, not to scale;

FIG. 2 is an isometric view of an embodiment of an installed mower pathassistance system, not to scale;

FIG. 3 is an isometric view of an embodiment of a mower path assistancesystem, not to scale;

FIG. 4 is an isometric view of an embodiment of an installed mower pathassistance system, not to scale;

FIG. 5 is an isometric view of an embodiment of a mower path assistancesystem having a barrier mat and a skirting membrane, not to scale;

FIG. 6 is an isometric view of an embodiment of a mower path assistancesystem having a barrier mat and an installed skirting membrane, not toscale;

FIG. 7 is an isometric view of an embodiment of a mower path assistancesystem having an installed barrier mat and a skirting membrane, not toscale;

FIG. 8 is a top plan view of an embodiment of a barrier mat, not toscale;

FIG. 9 is a top plan view of an embodiment of a barrier mat, not toscale;

FIG. 10 is a left side elevation view of an embodiment of a barrier mat,not to scale;

FIG. 11 is a front side elevation view of an embodiment of a barriermat, not to scale;

FIG. 12 is a top plan view of an embodiment of a skirting membrane, notto scale;

FIG. 13 is another top plan view of an embodiment of a skirtingmembrane, not to scale;

FIG. 14 is a left side elevation view of an embodiment of a skirtingmembrane, not to scale;

FIG. 15 is a front side elevation view of an embodiment of a skirtingmembrane, not to scale;

FIG. 16 is a left side elevation view of an embodiment of a mower pathassistance system having a barrier mat and a bonded skirting membrane,not to scale;

FIG. 17 is a front side elevation view of an embodiment of a mower pathassistance system having a barrier mat and a bonded skirting membrane,not to scale;

FIG. 18 is a top plan view of an embodiment of an herbicide layer, notto scale;

FIG. 19 is another top plan view of an embodiment of an herbicide layer,not to scale;

FIG. 20 is a left side elevation view of an embodiment of an herbicidelayer, not to scale;

FIG. 21 is a front elevation view of an embodiment of an herbicidelayer, not to scale;

FIG. 22 is a left side elevation view of an embodiment of a mower pathassistance system having a barrier mat and a bonded herbicide layer, notto scale;

FIG. 23 is a front side elevation view of an embodiment of a mower pathassistance system having a barrier mat and a bonded herbicide layer, notto scale;

FIG. 24 is a left side elevation view of an embodiment of a mower pathassistance system having a barrier mat and a bonded recessed herbicidelayer, not to scale;

FIG. 25 is a front side elevation view of an embodiment of a mower pathassistance system having a barrier mat and a bonded recessed herbicidelayer, not to scale;

FIG. 26 is a left side elevation view of an embodiment of a mower pathassistance system having a barrier mat, a bonded skirting membrane and abonded herbicide layer, not to scale;

FIG. 27 is a front side elevation view of an embodiment of a mower pathassistance system having a barrier mat, a bonded skirting membrane and abonded herbicide layer, not to scale;

FIG. 28 is a left side elevation view of an embodiment of a mower pathassistance system having a barrier mat, a bonded skirting membrane and abonded recessed herbicide layer, not to scale; and

FIG. 29 is a front side elevation view of an embodiment of a mower pathassistance system having a barrier mat, a bonded skirting membrane and abonded recessed herbicide layer, not to scale.

These drawings are provided to assist in the understanding of theexemplary embodiments of the presently disclosed mower path assistancesystem, as described in more detail below and should not be construed asunduly limiting the mower path assistance system. In particular, therelative spacing, positioning, sizing and dimensions of the variouselements illustrated in the drawings are not drawn to scale and may havebeen exaggerated, reduced or otherwise modified for the purpose ofimproved clarity. Those of ordinary skill in the art will alsoappreciate that a range of alternative configurations have been omittedsimply to improve the clarity and reduce the number of drawings.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

A mower path assistance system and method to improve mowing efficiencyand reduce the dangers of mowing around obstacles protruding from theground. The system provides a secondary benefit of reducing vegetationgrowth around posts, guy wires, trees, and other lawn obstacles, whileimproving mower safety and efficiency by reducing the amount ofdeviation required to mow around such obstacles. The term grass alsoincludes weeds and any vegetation, and is not intended to be limited toordinary lawn grass.

Lawn mowers cannot mow directly against posts, guy wires and othervertical lawn obstacles without introducing significant risk into themowing process. As a result those who take care of lawns must useadditional equipment, such as weed eaters, to cut the grass surroundingthe posts, guy wires and other obstacles. Consequently, time is wastedand additional labor is required. Further, some lawn caretakers alsointroduce the additional step of use herbicide to kill vegetation aroundlawn obstacles, often producing a patch of dead and unattractive grasssurrounding the obstacle and introducing environmental concerns.

The current invention facilitates mowing a lawn without having tosignificantly deviate from a highly efficient substantially parallelback-and-forth mowing path, thereby increasing the mowing efficiency,reducing the risk of injury to the person or the equipment, and reducingthe amount of follow up work with additional equipment to rid the grassaround lawn obstacles. The preferred embodiments of the deviceaccomplish this by new and novel arrangements of elements and methodsthat are configured in unique and novel ways and which demonstratepreviously unavailable but preferred and desirable capabilities,offering significant labor savings while reducing the safety risksassociated with mowing around such obstructions and eliminatingenvironmental concerns associated with vegetation suppressionapplications. The detailed description set forth below in connectionwith the drawings is intended merely as a description of the presentlypreferred embodiments, and is not intended to represent the only form,systems, and methods which may be constructed or utilized. Thedescription sets forth the designs, functions, means, and methods inconnection with the illustrated embodiments. It is to be understood,however, that the same or equivalent functions and features may beaccomplished by different embodiments that are also intended to beencompassed within the spirit and scope.

Barrier Mat (2000)

As seen in FIGS. 1-7, a mower path assistance system (1000) isconfigured to be installed around a lawn obstacle (O) on top of theground (G), grass, or vegetation. In one embodiment, the barrier system(1000) comprises of a barrier mat (2000) having a barrier mat aperture(2100) and a barrier mat installation slit (2200), or multi-piececonstruction incorporating interlocking aspects. The barrier mat (2000)maybe composed of, but is not limited to, compositions including naturalrubber (latex—grown from plants), synthetic rubber (made artificially ina chemical plant or laboratory) such as styrene butadiene (SBR),polyacrylics, polyvinyl acetate (PVA), polyvinyl chloride (PVC),polychloroprene (better known as neoprene), and various types ofpolyurethane, plastics, both natural and synthetic, includingthermoplastics, thermosets, bioplastics made of natural materials suchas those using natural materials such as grass, trees, and corn insteadof fossil fuels, biodegradable plastics engineered to break down such asphotodegradable and oxydegradable compositions, and eco/recycledplastics, as well as fabrics, paper products, composites includingnatural composites, fiber reinforced plastic, and polymer matrixcomposites, and laminates thereof. One embodiment of the barrier mat(2000) is fiber reinforced.

In one embodiment the barrier mat installation slit (2200) extends froma perimeter edge to the mat aperture (2100) and creates a pathway for anobstacle (O) to pass when the barrier mat (2000) is twisted or deformedto allow entry of the obstacle (O). Furthermore, the pathway created bythe barrier mat installation slit (2200) leads to the barrier mataperture (2100). Once the lawn obstacle (O) is located inside of thebarrier mat aperture (2100), the barrier mat (2000) is allowed to relaxand return to its relaxed state; thereby securing the barrier mat (2000)around the lawn obstacle (O). Next the barrier mat (2000) is positionedin the desired orientation that improves mowing efficiency and reducesrisk.

Now with reference to the embodiment of FIGS. 8 and 9, the barrier mataperture (2100) has a barrier mat aperture diameter (2120) that isconfigured to accept various lawn obstacles (O) that may vary indiameter to one another, however the barrier mat aperture (2100) is notlimited to being circular in shape and references to the barrier mataperture diameter (2120) apply to the largest opening dimension of thebarrier mat aperture (2100) in non-circular embodiments. The pathway maybe created by deforming the barrier mat (2000) with a deformation forceof less than 10 lbf to create a pathway width that is at least 50% ofthe barrier mat aperture diameter (2120), while in another embodimentthe pathway width is at least 75% of the barrier mat aperture diameter(2120), and in yet a further embodiment the pathway width is at least90% of the barrier mat aperture diameter (2120). A further series ofembodiments presents an upper boundary for the pathway width to provideadditional durability and usability by capping the pathway width to nomore than 100% of the aperture diameter (2120), and no more than 95% ofthe aperture diameter (2120) in another embodiment, and no more than 90%of the aperture diameter (2120) in yet a further embodiment.

An internal edge, or edges, of the barrier mat aperture (2100) define abarrier mat aperture lineal length. Similarly, the perimeter edge, oredges, of the barrier mat (2000) defines a perimeter edge lineal length.In one embodiment the perimeter edge lineal length is at least threetimes greater than the barrier mat aperture lineal length, at least fourtimes greater in another embodiment, at least six times greater in afurther embodiment, and at least eight times greater in still anotherembodiment. Another series of embodiments caps this relationship byhaving the perimeter edge lineal length no more than fifteen timesgreater than the barrier mat aperture lineal length in one embodiment,no more than thirteen times greater in a further embodiment, and no morethan eleven times greater in still another embodiment.

In one embodiment, the barrier mat aperture diameter (2120) may beenlarged by removing one or more aperture diameter expansion rings(2130) formed in the barrier mat (2000) disposed around the barrier mataperture (2100), which may be held into place by thin strips of aperturediameter expansion ring connecting material (2140), as seen in FIG. 9.In one embodiment such tear-away aperture diameter expansion rings(2130) allow adjustability from an initial barrier mat aperture diameter(2120) to a maximum barrier mat aperture diameter (2120), wherein themaximum barrier mat aperture diameter (2120) is at least 10% greaterthan the initial barrier mat aperture diameter (2120), while in afurther embodiment it is at least 20% greater, and at least 30% greaterin yet another embodiment.

In one particular embodiment directed to ensuring the structuralstability of the barrier mat aperture (2100), the maximum barrier mataperture diameter (2120) is no more than 75% greater than the initialbarrier mat aperture diameter (2120), and no more than 50% greater instill another embodiment. One particular embodiment has the aperturediameter (2120) of at least 4″, while in another embodiment it is atleast 6″, and in an even further embodiment it is at least 8″. Theaperture diameter (2120) is preferably less than 14″ in one embodiment,and less than 12″ in another embodiment, and less than 10″ in yet afurther embodiment. As previously disclosed the aperture may be othergeometries and in one embodiment covering all shapes the open area ofthe aperture is at least 12 in², and at least 26 in² in anotherembodiment, and at least 45 in² in still a further embodiment. Further,the open area of the aperture is preferable less than 155 in², and lessthan 115 in² in another embodiment, and less than 80 in² in yet anotherembodiment. The barrier mat installation slit (2200) has a length thatis preferably at least 25% of the aperture diameter (2120), and at least35% in another embodiment, and at least 50% in yet a further embodiment.However, another series of embodiments closes the upper bound of therange with the length of the installation slit (2200) being no more thanthe aperture diameter (2120), and no more than 80% of the aperturediameter (2120) in a further embodiment, and no more than 75% of theaperture diameter (2120) in yet another embodiment. In one embodiment,as seen in FIG. 8, the barrier mat installation slit (2200) intersectsthe perimeter at the intersection of the barrier mat sinistral proximaledge axis and the barrier dextral proximal edge axis, however oneskilled in the art will appreciate another embodiment whereby thebarrier mat installation slit (2200) intersects the perimeter at theintersection of the barrier mat sinistral distal edge axis and thebarrier dextral distal edge axis. The barrier mat installation slit(2200) may be positioned such that an imaginary extension of the barriermat installation slit (2200) passes through a centroid of the barriermat aperture (2100).

The barrier mat (2000) has a barrier mat top surface (2360), a barriermat bottom surface (2370), and a barrier mat thickness (2380), as seenin FIGS. 10 and 11. In one embodiment the barrier mat (2000) issubstantially oval and therefore has a continuous perimeter edge, and inone oval embodiment a maximum length dimension is at least 1.5 times amaximum width dimension, which is measure perpendicular to the maximumlength dimension, and thus having an aspect ratio, the maximum lengthdivided by the maximum width, of at least 1.5, while in anotherembodiment the aspect ratio is at least 2.0, and in still a furtherembodiment the aspect ratio is at least 2.5. It is important to notethat such aspect ratios apply equally regardless of whether the barriermat (2000) is substantially oval in shape or any other shape, such asthe illustrated embodiments having distinct sidewall edges. In anotherembodiment the aspect ratio is no more than 5.0, while in a furtherembodiment the aspect ratio is no more than 4.0, and in yet anotherembodiment the aspect ratio is no more than 3.0. Such aspect ratios haveprovided unexpected results by significantly reducing the likelihood ofthe barrier mat (2000) being drawn up into the blade or wheels of amower as it passes over a portion of the barrier mat (2000) andproviding a sufficient approach distance to reduce the required amountof deviation from the mowing path.

Therefore, in one embodiment the barrier mat (2000) includes as leastfour distinct sidewall edges, namely, as seen in FIGS. 8 and 9, abarrier mat sinistral proximal edge (2320), having a barrier matsinistral proximal edge x-coordinate length (2322) and a barrier matsinistral proximal edge y-coordinate length (2324); a barrier matdextral proximal edge (2330), having a barrier mat dextral proximal edgex-coordinate length (2332) and a barrier mat dextral proximal edgey-coordinate length (2334); a barrier mat sinistral distal edge (2340),having a barrier mat sinistral distal edge x-coordinate length (2342)and a barrier mat sinistral distal edge y-coordinate length (2344); abarrier mat dextral distal edge (2350), having a barrier mat dextraldistal edge x-coordinate length (2352) and a barrier mat dextral distaledge y-coordinate length (2354). One skilled in the art will appreciatethat this embodiment is similar to that of FIGS. 8 and 9 but without theseparate and distinct barrier mat sinistral edge (2300) and barrier matdextral edge (2310), rather the barrier mat sinistral proximal edge(2320) may join the barrier mat sinistral distal edge (2340) via asmooth radiused transition or a sharp intersection, and the barrier matdextral proximal edge (2330) may join the barrier mat dextral distaledge (2350) via a smooth radiused transition or a sharp intersection.Thus, one skilled in the art will further recognize that in such asymmetrical embodiment the aspect ratio is accordingly the sum of thebarrier mat sinistral proximal edge x-coordinate length (2322) and thebarrier mat dextral proximal edge x-coordinate length (2332) divided bythe sum of the barrier mat sinistral proximal edge y-coordinate length(2324) and the barrier mat sinistral distal edge y-coordinate length(2344), although asymmetric embodiments are included in this disclosure.Regardless of the symmetry, in this embodiment at least one anglebetween two of the edges is obtuse. For example, as seen in FIG. 8, anaxis of the barrier mat sinistral distal edge (2340) intersects with theaxis of the barrier dextral distal edge (2350) and forms a barrier matsinistral distal edge to dextral distal edge angle (2460) that isgreater than 90 degrees. In this embodiment the axes are easily definedbecause the edges are straight, however in embodiments having curvededges, each point along the edge has a tangent line defining a tangencyangle, and an average of all the tangency angles establishes the axisfor the associated edge. Likewise, on the opposite side of FIG. 8, theangle between the barrier mat sinistral proximal edge (2320) and thebarrier mat dextral proximal edge (2330) is the sum of a barrier matsinistral proximal edge to installation slit angle (2400) and a barriermat dextral proximal edge to installation slit angle (2410), and in oneembodiment this sum angle is an obtuse angle. In a further embodiment atleast one of the barrier mat sinistral proximal edge to installationslit angle (2400) and the barrier mat dextral proximal edge toinstallation slit angle (2410) are acute, while in yet anotherembodiment both the barrier mat sinistral proximal edge to installationslit angle (2400) and the barrier mat dextral proximal edge toinstallation slit angle (2410) are acute. In further embodiments any ofthe disclosed obtuse angles, or those disclosed as being greater than 90degrees, are at least 100 degrees, while in still further embodimentsany of the disclosed obtuse angles are at least 110 degrees, and in yetmore embodiments any of the disclosed obtuse angles are at least 120degrees. In even more variations, any of the disclosed obtuse angles areno more than 170 degrees, while in still further embodiments any of thedisclosed obtuse angles are no more than 160 degrees, and in yet moreembodiments any of the disclosed obtuse angles are no more than 150degrees. Further, in one specific embodiment, as seen in FIGS. 8 and 9,the barrier mat (2000) has at least four distinct edges having straightsegments and at least two of the angles formed between the straightsegments of adjacent edges are obtuse angles, while in a furtherembodiment at least three of the angles formed between the straightsegments of adjacent edges are obtuse angles, and in still anotherembodiment at least four of the angles formed between the straightsegments of adjacent edges are obtuse angles. In yet another specificembodiment the barrier mat (2000) has at least five distinct edgeshaving straight segments and at least three of the angles formed betweenthe straight segments of adjacent edges are obtuse angles, while in afurther embodiment at least four of the angles formed between thestraight segments of adjacent edges are obtuse angles, and in stillanother embodiment at least five of the angles formed between thestraight segments of adjacent edges are obtuse angles. Still anotherspecific embodiment the barrier mat (2000) has at least six distinctedges having straight segments and at least four of the angles formedbetween the straight segments of adjacent edges are obtuse angles, whilein a further embodiment at least five of the angles formed between thestraight segments of adjacent edges are obtuse angles, and in stillanother embodiment at least six of the angles formed between thestraight segments of adjacent edges are obtuse angles.

One embodiment has the barrier mat sinistral proximal edge x-coordinatelength (2322) being at least 50% greater than the barrier mat sinistralproximal edge y-coordinate length (2324); similarly another embodimenthas the barrier mat sinistral distal edge x-coordinate length (2342)being at least 50% greater than the barrier mat sinistral distal edgey-coordinate length (2344); similarly yet a further embodiment has thebarrier mat dextral proximal edge x-coordinate length (2332) being atleast 50% greater than the barrier mat dextral proximal edgey-coordinate length (2334); and a final embodiment has the barrier matdextral distal edge x-coordinate length (2352) being at least 50%greater than the barrier mat dextral distal edge y-coordinate length(2354), while further embodiments incorporate any combinations thereof.Still further embodiments uniquely cap the upper end of theserelationships to further ensure stability and safety of the barrier mat(2000). For example, in one embodiment has the barrier mat sinistralproximal edge x-coordinate length (2322) is no more than 200% greaterthan the barrier mat sinistral proximal edge y-coordinate length (2324);similarly another embodiment has the barrier mat sinistral distal edgex-coordinate length (2342) is no more than 200% greater than the barriermat sinistral distal edge y-coordinate length (2344); similarly yet afurther embodiment has the barrier mat dextral proximal edgex-coordinate length (2332) is no more than 200% greater than the barriermat dextral proximal edge y-coordinate length (2334); and a finalembodiment has the barrier mat dextral distal edge x-coordinate length(2352) is no more than 200% greater than the barrier mat dextral distaledge y-coordinate length (2354), while further embodiments incorporateany combinations thereof. In still another embodiment these benefits areenhanced when the barrier mat sinistral proximal edge x-coordinatelength (2322) is greater than the aperture diameter (2120) and thebarrier mat sinistral proximal edge y-coordinate length (2324) is lessthan the aperture diameter (2120); similarly another embodiment has thebarrier mat sinistral distal edge x-coordinate length (2342) greaterthan the aperture diameter (2120) and the barrier mat sinistral distaledge y-coordinate length (2344) is less than the aperture diameter(2120); similarly yet a further embodiment has the barrier mat dextralproximal edge x-coordinate length (2332) is greater than the aperturediameter (2120) and the barrier mat dextral proximal edge y-coordinatelength (2334) is less than the aperture diameter (2120); and a finalembodiment has the barrier mat dextral distal edge x-coordinate length(2352) is greater than the aperture diameter (2120) and the barrier matdextral distal edge y-coordinate length (2354) is less than the aperturediameter (2120), while further embodiments incorporate any combinationsthereof. In another embodiment at least two of the barrier mat sinistralproximal edge x-coordinate length (2322), the barrier mat dextralproximal edge x-coordinate length (2332), the barrier mat sinistraldistal edge x-coordinate length (2342), and the barrier mat dextraldistal edge x-coordinate length (2352) are substantially equal.Similarly, in a further embodiment at least two of the barrier matsinistral proximal edge y-coordinate length (2324), the barrier matdextral proximal edge y-coordinate length (2334), the barrier matsinistral distal edge y-coordinate length (2344), and the barrier matdextral distal edge y-coordinate length (2354) are substantially equal.

Another embodiment has exhibited even further improvements to safety anddurability via the introduction of at least a distinct barrier matsinistral edge (2300), having a barrier mat sinistral edge length(2305), and/or a barrier mat dextral edge (2310), having a barrier matdextral edge length (2315), also seen in FIGS. 8 and 9, either, or both,of which may be substantially perpendicular to a long axis of thebarrier mat (2000). In one embodiment the barrier mat sinistral edgelength (2305) and/or the barrier mat dextral edge length (2315) is atleast 15% of the aperture diameter (2120), and at least 25% in anotherembodiment, and at least 35% in still a further embodiment. However, afurther series of embodiments exhibits additional benefits when thebarrier mat sinistral edge length (2305) and/or the barrier mat dextraledge length (2315) is no more than 100% of the aperture diameter (2120),and no more than 90% in another embodiment, and no more than 75% instill a further embodiment. Additionally, in yet a further series ofembodiments exhibits additional benefits when the barrier mat sinistraledge length (2305) and/or the barrier mat dextral edge length (2315) isno more than 100% of the largest of the sinistral proximal edgey-coordinate length (2324), the dextral proximal edge y-coordinatelength (2334), the sinistral distal edge y-coordinate length (2344),and/or the dextral distal edge y-coordinate length (2354), and no morethan 85% in another embodiment, and no more than 70% in still anotherembodiment.

The axis of the barrier mat sinistral proximal edge (2320) intersectswith the axis of the barrier mat sinistral edge (2300) forming a barriermat sinistral proximal edge to sinistral edge angle (2420).Additionally, the axis of the barrier mat dextral proximal edge (2330)intersects with the axis of the barrier mat dextral edge (2310) forminga barrier mat dextral proximal edge to dextral edge angle (2430).Furthermore, the axis of the barrier mat sinistral distal edge (2340)intersects with the axis of the barrier mat sinistral edge (2300)forming a barrier mat sinistral distal edge to sinistral edge angle(2440). Even furthermore, the axis of the barrier mat dextral distaledge (2350) intersects with the axis of the barrier mat dextral edge(2310) forming a barrier mat dextral distal edge to dextral edge angle(2450). In one embodiment one or more of the sinistral proximal edge tosinistral edge angle (2420), the dextral proximal edge to dextral edgeangle (2430), the sinistral distal edge to sinistral edge angle (2440),and the dextral distal edge to dextral edge angle (2450), are obtuse,while in a further embodiment one or more of them are no greater thanthe sinistral distal edge to dextral distal edge angle (2460) and/or thesum of the sinistral proximal edge to installation slit angle (2400) andthe dextral proximal edge to installation slit angle (2410). In anotherembodiment the sinistral distal edge to dextral distal edge angle (2460)is substantially equal to the sum of the sinistral proximal edge toinstallation slit angle (2400) and the dextral proximal edge toinstallation slit angle (2410). In a further embodiment the sinistralproximal edge to sinistral edge angle (2420) is substantially equal tothe sinistral distal edge to sinistral edge angle (2440), and in stillanother embodiment the dextral proximal edge to dextral edge angle(2430) is substantially equal to the dextral distal edge to dextral edgeangle (2450),

The barrier mat thickness (2380), the density of the barrier mat (2000),and the stiffness of the barrier mat (2000) also play a significant rolein the safety and durability of the barrier mat (2000). Suchrelationships must balance many competing factors so that the barriermat (2000) is flexible enough so that a tire running over a portion ofthe barrier mat (2000) does not cause another portion to lift off theground thereby increasing the likelihood that it is drawn into the bladeor is caught on another tire, yet the thickness (2380) cannot be such asto interfere with the tires, the blade, or the mower deck, such factorsoften being in contradiction with the disclosed size and geometricrelationships that provide improvements regarding mowing pathdeviations. Further, some embodiments of the barrier mat (2000) must beflexible enough to permit deformation in the vicinity of theinstallation slit (2200) to create a pathway for a lawn obstacle (O) topass, while in one embodiment ensuring the edges adjacent to theinstallation slit (2200) are separated by a distance of less than 0.25″,and no more than 0.125″ in another embodiment, and in yet a furtherembodiment at least a portion of the edges adjacent to the installationslit (2200) are in contact with one another before and afterinstallation around the obstacle (O). Therefore, as with the otherrelationships, seemingly unrelated relationships dramatically, andunexpectedly, increase the durability and safety of the barrier mat(2000). For instance, in one embodiment the barrier mat thickness (2380)is at least 5% of the aperture diameter (2120), while in anotherembodiment it is at least 7.5%, and is at least 10% in still a furtherembodiment. Yet a further series of embodiments balances the diminishingreturns, and increased safety risks, associated with too great of abarrier mat thickness (2380), thus in one embodiment the barrier matthickness (2380) is no more than 30% of the aperture diameter (2120),while in another embodiment it is no more than 25%, and is no more than20% in still a further embodiment. In one embodiment the barrier matthickness (2380) is at least 0.25″, while in a further embodiment it isat least 0.50″, while in still another embodiment it is no more than1.25″, and not more than 1.00″ in yet another embodiment. In oneembodiment the barrier mat thickness (2380) is constant throughout theentire barrier mat (2000), however in another embodiment the barrier matthickness (2380) varies throughout the barrier mat (2000). In oneembodiment the greatest barrier mat thickness (2380) is at the aperture,while in another embodiment the smallest barrier mat thickness (2380) isalong the exterior perimeter, and in yet a further embodiment thebarrier mat thickness (2380) at the installation slit (2200) is lessthan the barrier mat thickness (2380) at another point of the barriermat (2000). Such relationships further promote flexibility of thebarrier mat (2000) in areas most likely to be contacted by a mower, andstiffness in the vicinity of the obstacle, while balancing therequirements associated with the disclosed size and geometricrelationships. One particular embodiment has a reduced thickness zonedefined as the portion of the mat extending from the installation slit(2200) a distance of at least 25% of the aperture diameter (2120),wherein the barrier mat thickness (2380) throughout the reducedthickness zone is less than the barrier mat thickness (2380) at anotherpoint of the barrier mat (2000).

Further, in one embodiment the density of the barrier mat (2000) is atleast 20 lb/cf per ASTM D-3676, while in a further embodiment thedensity is at least 35 lb/cf, and in still another embodiment it is atleast 50 lb/cf. Another series of embodiments introduces upper limits tothe density range whereby the density is no more than 100 lb/cf, whilein a further embodiment the density is no more than 85 lb/cf, and instill another embodiment it is no more than 70 lb/cf. In one embodimentthe Shore A hardness of the barrier mat (2000) is at least 40, while inanother embodiment it is no more than 100, and in still a furtherembodiment it is 50-75. In another embodiment the shear modulus of thebarrier mat (2000) is less than 0.5 GPa, while in another embodiment itis less than 0.15, and in still a further embodiment it is less than0.10. The tensile strength of the barrier mat (2000) is preferably atleast 2000 psi, and at least 3000 psi in another embodiment, and atleast 4000 psi in yet a further embodiment. In one particular embodimentthe barrier mat (2000) is composed of SBR bonded granular recycledrubber.

In the illustrated embodiments the barrier mat (2000) is a unitary, orsingle-piece, construction, however it may be constructed in multiplesections containing interlocking features that secure the individualsections. In such multi-section embodiments the barrier mat installationslit (2200) consists of the abutting edges of adjacent sections thatcontact each other.

Skirting Membrane (3000)

Now referring to FIGS. 5-7, in another embodiment, the barrier system(1000) comprises of a barrier mat (2000) and a skirting membrane (3000)having a variable opening aperture (3100) and a skirting membraneinstallation slit (3200). The skirting membrane (3000) maybe composed ofany material that is more flexible than the barrier mat (2000),including, but not limited to, compositions including natural rubber(latex—grown from plants), synthetic rubber (made artificially in achemical plant or laboratory) such as styrene butadiene (SBR),polyacrylics, polyvinyl acetate (PVA), polyvinyl chloride (PVC),polychloroprene (better known as neoprene), and various types ofpolyurethane, plastics, both natural and synthetic, includingthermoplastics, thermosets, bioplastics made of natural materials suchas those using natural materials such as grass, trees, and corn insteadof fossil fuels, biodegradable plastics engineered to break down such asphotodegradable and oxydegradable compositions, and eco/recycledplastics, as well as fabrics, paper products, composites includingnatural composites, fiber reinforced plastic, and polymer matrixcomposites, and laminates thereof. In one embodiment the skirtingmembrane (3000) is composed of material that is both water and airimpermeable. In another embodiment majority, by volume, of the skirtingmembrane (3000) is composed a cork based material.

The skirting membrane installation slit (3200) extends from a perimeteredge to the skirting membrane (3000) and creates a pathway for a lawnobstacle (O) to pass when the skirting membrane (3000) is twisted ordeformed. Furthermore, the pathway created by the skirting membraneinstallation slit (3200) leads to the variable opening aperture (3100).Once the lawn obstacle (O) is located inside of the variable openingaperture (3100), the skirting membrane (3000) is untwisted, multiplevariable opening aperture slits (3110) form variable opening aperturearea adjustment portions (3120), as illustrated in FIGS. 12 and 13,which are flexible and at least partially confirm to the sides of thelawn obstacle (O), which helps prevent grass (G) from growing up throughthe center of the barrier mat (2000) and allows the use of the skirtingmembrane (3000) with lawn obstacles (O) with various sizes and shapes.Next the skirting membrane (3000) is positioned in the desiredorientation that maximizes mowing efficiency. After the skirtingmembrane (3000) and positioned, the barrier mat (2000) is installed andplaced over the previously installed skirting membrane (3000), as seenin FIGS. 5-7. The skirting membrane (3000) further serves to reduce themovement of the barrier mat (2000) when contacted by a portion of themower, as the skirting member (3000) produces a stronger interface withthe ground, and the interface between the barrier mat (2000) and theskirting member (3000) is stronger than that of the barrier mat (2000)placed directly on the ground, further reducing movement of the barriermat (2000).

In one particular embodiment directed to ensuring the structuralstability of the variable opening aperture (3100), the maximum variableopening aperture diameter is no more than 75% greater than the initialvariable opening aperture diameter, and no more than 50% greater instill another embodiment. One particular embodiment has the variableopening aperture diameter of at least 4″, while in another embodiment itis at least 6″, and in an even further embodiment it is at least 8″. Thevariable opening aperture diameter is preferably less than 14″ in oneembodiment, and less than 12″ in another embodiment, and less than 10″in yet a further embodiment. As previously disclosed, the variableopening aperture may be other geometries and in one embodiment coveringall shapes the open area of the aperture is at least 12 in², and atleast 26 in² in another embodiment, and at least 45 in² in still afurther embodiment. Further, the open area of the variable openingaperture is preferable less than 155 in², and less than 115 in² inanother embodiment, and less than 80 in² in yet another embodiment. Theskirting membrane installation slit (3200) has a length that ispreferably at least 25% of the variable opening aperture diameter, andat least 35% in another embodiment, and at least 50% in yet a furtherembodiment. However, another series of embodiments closes the upperbound of the range with the length of the skirting membrane installationslit (3200) being no more than the variable opening aperture diameter,and no more than 80% of the variable opening aperture diameter in afurther embodiment, and no more than 75% of the variable openingaperture diameter in yet another embodiment.

The skirting membrane (3000) has a skirting membrane top surface (3360),a skirting membrane bottom surface (3370), and a skirting membranethickness (3380), as seen in FIGS. 14 and 15. In one embodiment theskirting membrane (3000) is substantially oval and therefore has acontinuous perimeter edge, and in one oval embodiment a maximum lengthdimension is at least 1.5 times a maximum width dimension, which ismeasure perpendicular to the maximum length dimension, and thus havingan aspect ratio, the maximum length divided by the maximum width, of atleast 1.5, while in another embodiment the aspect ratio is at least 2.0,and in still a further embodiment the aspect ratio is at least 2.5. Itis important to note that such aspect ratios apply equally regardless ofwhether the skirting membrane (3000) is substantially oval in shape orany other shape, such as the illustrated embodiments having distinctsidewall edges. In another embodiment the aspect ratio is no more than5.0, while in a further embodiment the aspect ratio is no more than 4.0,and in yet another embodiment the aspect ratio is no more than 3.0. Suchaspect ratios have provided unexpected results by significantly reducingthe likelihood of the skirting membrane (3000) being drawn up into theblade or wheels of a mower as it passes over a portion of the skirtingmembrane (3000). In a further embodiment at least one of the skirtingmembrane top surface (3360) and/or the skirting membrane bottom surface(3370) is textured and has an average roughness (Sa) value of greaterthan 15 μm, and greater than greater than 50 μm in another embodiment,and greater than 75 μm in yet another embodiment. In a furtherembodiment the barrier mat bottom surface (2370) is textured and has anaverage roughness (Sa) value of greater than 15 μm, and greater thangreater than 50 μm in another embodiment, and greater than 75 μm in yetanother embodiment.

Therefore, in one embodiment the skirting membrane (3000) includes asleast four distinct sidewall edges, namely, as seen in FIGS. 12 and 13,a skirting membrane sinistral proximal edge (3320), having a skirtingmembrane sinistral proximal edge x-coordinate length (3322) and askirting membrane sinistral proximal edge y-coordinate length (3324); askirting membrane dextral proximal edge (3330), having a skirtingmembrane dextral proximal edge x-coordinate length (3332) and a skirtingmembrane dextral proximal edge y-coordinate length (3334); a skirtingmembrane sinistral distal edge (3340), having a skirting membranesinistral distal edge x-coordinate length (3342) and a skirting membranesinistral distal edge y-coordinate length (3344); a skirting membranedextral distal edge (3350), having a skirting membrane dextral distaledge x-coordinate length (3352) and a skirting membrane dextral distaledge y-coordinate length (3354). One skilled in the art will appreciatethat this embodiment is similar to that of FIGS. 12 and 13 but withoutthe separate and distinct skirting membrane sinistral edge (3300) andskirting membrane dextral edge (3310), rather the skirting membranesinistral proximal edge (3320) may join the skirting membrane sinistraldistal edge (3340) via a smooth radiused transition or a sharpintersection, and the skirting membrane dextral proximal edge (3330) mayjoin the skirting membrane dextral distal edge (3350) via a smoothradiused transition or a sharp intersection. Thus, one skilled in theart will further recognize that in such a symmetrical embodiment theaspect ratio is accordingly the sum of the skirting membrane sinistralproximal edge x-coordinate length (3322) and the skirting membranedextral proximal edge x-coordinate length (3332) divided by the sum ofthe skirting membrane sinistral proximal edge y-coordinate length (3324)and the skirting membrane sinistral distal edge y-coordinate length(3344), although asymmetric embodiments are included in this disclosure.Regardless of the symmetry, in this embodiment at least one anglebetween two of the edges is obtuse. For example, as seen in FIG. 12, anaxis of the skirting membrane sinistral distal edge (3340) intersectswith the axis of the skirting membrane distal edge (3350) and forms askirting membrane sinistral distal edge to dextral distal edge angle(3460) that is greater than 90 degrees. In this embodiment the axes areeasily defined because the edges are straight, however in embodimentshaving curved edges, each point along the edge has a tangent linedefining a tangency angle, and an average of all the tangency anglesestablishes the axis for the associated edge. Likewise, on the oppositeside of FIG. 12, the angle between the skirting membrane sinistralproximal edge (3320) and the skirting membrane dextral proximal edge(3330) is the sum of a skirting membrane sinistral proximal edge toinstallation slit angle (3400) and a skirting membrane dextral proximaledge to installation slit angle (3410), and in one embodiment this sumangle is an obtuse angle. In a further embodiment at least one of theskirting membrane sinistral proximal edge to installation slit angle(3400) and the skirting membrane dextral proximal edge to installationslit angle (3410) are acute, while in yet another embodiment both theskirting membrane sinistral proximal edge to installation slit angle(3400) and the skirting membrane dextral proximal edge to installationslit angle (3410) are acute. In further embodiments any of the disclosedobtuse angles are at least 100 degrees, while in still furtherembodiments any of the disclosed obtuse angles are at least 110 degrees,and in yet more embodiments any of the disclosed obtuse angles are atleast 120 degrees. In even more variations, any of the disclosed obtuseangles are no more than 170 degrees, while in still further embodimentsany of the disclosed obtuse angles are no more than 160 degrees, and inyet more embodiments any of the disclosed obtuse angles are no more than150 degrees. Unlike conventional circular or rectangular weed barriersthat tend to be caught on mower tires or drawn into the blade due inpart to edge orientation, stiffness, thickness, and light weight, justto name a few, the orientation and relationships of the present edgesand angles significantly reduce the likelihood of such instancesoccurring since the tire and mowing deck do not first encounter thebarrier mat (2000) at a ninety degree angle.

One embodiment has the skirting membrane sinistral proximal edgex-coordinate length (3322) being at least 50% greater than the skirtingmembrane sinistral proximal edge y-coordinate length (3324); similarlyanother embodiment has the skirting membrane sinistral distal edgex-coordinate length (3342) being at least 50% greater than the skirtingmembrane sinistral distal edge y-coordinate length (3344); similarly yeta further embodiment has the skirting membrane dextral proximal edgex-coordinate length (3332) being at least 50% greater than the skirtingmembrane dextral proximal edge y-coordinate length (3334); and a finalembodiment has the skirting membrane dextral distal edge x-coordinatelength (3352) being at least 50% greater than the skirting membranedextral distal edge y-coordinate length (3354), while furtherembodiments incorporate any combinations thereof. Still furtherembodiments uniquely cap the upper end of these relationships to furtherensure stability and safety of the skirting membrane (3000). Forexample, in one embodiment has the skirting membrane sinistral proximaledge x-coordinate length (3322) is no more than 200% greater than theskirting membrane sinistral proximal edge y-coordinate length (3324);similarly another embodiment has the skirting membrane sinistral distaledge x-coordinate length (3342) is no more than 200% greater than theskirting membrane sinistral distal edge y-coordinate length (3344);similarly yet a further embodiment has the skirting membrane dextralproximal edge x-coordinate length (3332) is no more than 200% greaterthan the skirting membrane dextral proximal edge y-coordinate length(3334); and a final embodiment has the skirting membrane dextral distaledge x-coordinate length (3352) is no more than 200% greater than theskirting membrane dextral distal edge y-coordinate length (3354), whilefurther embodiments incorporate any combinations thereof. In stillanother embodiment these benefits are enhanced when the skirtingmembrane sinistral proximal edge x-coordinate length (3322) is greaterthan the skirting membrane aperture diameter and the skirting membranesinistral proximal edge y-coordinate length (3324) is less than theskirting membrane aperture diameter; similarly another embodiment hasthe skirting membrane sinistral distal edge x-coordinate length (3342)greater than the skirting membrane aperture diameter and the skirtingmembrane sinistral distal edge y-coordinate length (3344) is less thanthe skirting membrane aperture diameter; similarly yet a furtherembodiment has the skirting membrane dextral proximal edge x-coordinatelength (3332) is greater than the skirting membrane aperture diameterand the skirting membrane dextral proximal edge y-coordinate length(3334) is less than the skirting membrane aperture diameter; and a finalembodiment has the skirting membrane dextral distal edge x-coordinatelength (3352) is greater than the skirting membrane aperture diameterand the skirting membrane dextral distal edge y-coordinate length (3354)is less than the skirting membrane aperture diameter, while furtherembodiments incorporate any combinations thereof. In another embodimentat least two of the skirting membrane sinistral proximal edgex-coordinate length (3322), the skirting membrane dextral proximal edgex-coordinate length (3332), the skirting membrane sinistral distal edgex-coordinate length (3342), and the skirting membrane dextral distaledge x-coordinate length (3352) are substantially equal. Similarly, in afurther embodiment at least two of the skirting membrane sinistralproximal edge y-coordinate length (3324), the skirting membrane dextralproximal edge y-coordinate length (3334), the skirting membranesinistral distal edge y-coordinate length (3344), and the skirtingmembrane dextral distal edge y-coordinate length (3354) aresubstantially equal.

Another embodiment has exhibited even further improvements to safety anddurability via the introduction of at least a distinct skirting membranesinistral edge (3300), having a skirting membrane sinistral edge length(3305), and/or a skirting membrane dextral edge (3310), having askirting membrane dextral edge length (3315), also seen in FIGS. 12 and13, either, or both, of which may be substantially perpendicular to along axis of the skirting membrane (3000). In one embodiment theskirting membrane sinistral edge length (3305) and/or the skirtingmembrane dextral edge length (3315) is at least 15% of the skirtingmembrane aperture diameter, and at least 25% in another embodiment, andat least 35% in still a further embodiment. However, a further series ofembodiments exhibits additional benefits when the skirting membranesinistral edge length (3305) and/or the skirting membrane dextral edgelength (3315) is no more than 100% of the skirting membrane aperturediameter, and no more than 90% in another embodiment, and no more than75% in still a further embodiment. Additionally, in yet a further seriesof embodiments exhibits additional benefits when the skirting membranesinistral edge length (3305) and/or the skirting membrane dextral edgelength (3315) is no more than 100% of the largest of the sinistralproximal edge y-coordinate length (3324), the dextral proximal edgey-coordinate length (3334), the sinistral distal edge y-coordinatelength (3344), and/or the dextral distal edge y-coordinate length(3354), and no more than 85% in another embodiment, and no more than 70%in still another embodiment.

The axis of the skirting membrane sinistral proximal edge (3320)intersects with the axis of the skirting membrane mat sinistral edge(3300) forming a skirting membrane sinistral proximal edge to sinistraledge angle (3420). Additionally, the axis of the skirting membranedextral proximal edge (3330) intersects with the axis of the skirtingmembrane dextral edge (3310) forming a skirting membrane dextralproximal edge to dextral edge angle (3430). Furthermore, the axis of theskirting membrane sinistral distal edge (3340) intersects with the axisof the skirting membrane sinistral edge (3300) forming a skirtingmembrane sinistral distal edge to sinistral edge angle (3440). Evenfurthermore, the axis of the skirting membrane dextral distal edge(3350) intersects with the axis of the skirting membrane dextral edge(3310) forming a skirting membrane dextral distal edge to dextral edgeangle (3450). In one embodiment one or more of the sinistral proximaledge to sinistral edge angle (3420), the dextral proximal edge todextral edge angle (3430), the sinistral distal edge to sinistral edgeangle (3440), and the dextral distal edge to dextral edge angle (3450),are obtuse, while in a further embodiment one or more of them are nogreater than the sinistral distal edge to dextral distal edge angle(3460) and/or the sum of the sinistral proximal edge to installationslit angle (3400) and the dextral proximal edge to installation slitangle (3410). In another embodiment the sinistral distal edge to dextraldistal edge angle (3460) is substantially equal to the sum of thesinistral proximal edge to installation slit angle (3400) and thedextral proximal edge to installation slit angle (3410). In a furtherembodiment the sinistral proximal edge to sinistral edge angle (3420) issubstantially equal to the sinistral distal edge to sinistral edge angle(3440), and in still another embodiment the dextral proximal edge todextral edge angle (3430) is substantially equal to the dextral distaledge to dextral edge angle (3450),

The skirting membrane thickness (3380), the density of the skirtingmembrane (3000), and the stiffness of the skirting membrane (3000) alsoplay a significant role in the safety and durability of the skirtingmembrane (3000). Such relationships must balance many competing factorsso that the skirting membrane (3000) is flexible enough so that a tirerunning over a portion of the skirting membrane (3000) does not causeanother portion to lift off the ground thereby increasing the likelihoodthat it is drawn into the blade or is caught on another tire, yet thethickness (3380) cannot be such as to interfere with the tires, theblade, or the mower deck. Further, some embodiments of the skirtingmembrane (3000) must be flexible enough to permit deformation in thevicinity of the installation slit (3200) to create a pathway for a lawnobstacle (O) to pass, while in one embodiment ensuring the edgesadjacent to the installation slit (3200) are separated by a distance ofless than 0.25″, and no more than 0.125″ in another embodiment, and inyet a further embodiment at least a portion of the edges adjacent to theinstallation slit (3200) are in contact with one another before andafter installation around the obstacle (O). Therefore, as with the otherrelationships, seemingly unrelated relationships dramatically, andunexpectedly, increase the durability and safety of the skirtingmembrane (3000). For instance, in one embodiment the skirting membranethickness (3380) is at least 1% of the skirting membrane aperturediameter, while in another embodiment it is at least 2%, and is at least3% in still a further embodiment. Yet a further series of embodimentsbalances the diminishing returns, and increased safety risks, associatedwith too great of a skirting membrane thickness (3380), thus in oneembodiment the skirting membrane thickness (3380) is no more than 30% ofthe aperture diameter, while in another embodiment it is no more than25%, and is no more than 20% in still a further embodiment. In oneembodiment the skirting membrane thickness (3380) is at least 0.0625″,while in a further embodiment it is at least 0.1250″, while in stillanother embodiment it is no more than 0.375″, and not more than 0.250″in yet another embodiment. In one embodiment the skirting membranethickness (2380) is constant throughout the entire skirting membrane(3000), however in another embodiment the skirting membrane thickness(3380) varies throughout the skirting membrane (3000). In one embodimentthe greatest skirting membrane thickness (3380) is at the aperture,while in another embodiment the smallest skirting membrane thickness(3380) is along the exterior perimeter, and in yet a further embodimentthe skirting membrane thickness (3380) at the installation slit (3200)is less than the skirting membrane thickness (3380) at another point ofthe skirting membrane (3000). One particular embodiment has a reducedthickness zone defined as the portion of the skirting membrane extendingfrom the installation slit (3200) a distance of at least 25% of theskirting membrane aperture diameter, wherein the skirting membranethickness (3380) throughout the reduced thickness zone is less than theskirting membrane thickness (3380) at another point of the skirtingmembrane (3000). In yet a further embodiment the skirting membranethickness (3380) is no more than 15% of the barrier mat thickness(2380), while it is no more than 12.5% in another embodiment, and nomore than 10% in still a further embodiment. Further, in one embodimentthe density of the skirting membrane (3000) is less than the density ofthe barrier mat (2000), while in a further embodiment the density of theskirting membrane (3000) at least 25% less is less than the density ofthe barrier mat (2000), and in an even further embodiment it is at least50% less. In another embodiment, the barrier system (1000) comprises abarrier mat (2000) and a skirting membrane (3000), wherein the barriermat (2000) and skirting membrane (3000) have approximately the samedimensions, and majority of the skirting membrane top surface (3360) ispermanently bonded to the barrier mat bottom surface (2370), asillustrated in FIGS. 16 and 17. These relationships are critical andestablish adequate flexibility of the skirting membrane (3000) to engagethe obstacle and the barrier mat (2000), contact area with the barriermat (2000), and retain the barrier mat (2000) as the driving element tokeep the barrier system (1000) secure and in place while allowing somemovement with respect to the obstacle while providing an improvedcontact relationship with the obstacle.

In the illustrated embodiments the skirting membrane (3000) is aunitary, or single-piece, construction, however it may be constructed inmultiple sections containing interlocking features that secure theindividual sections. In such multi-section embodiments the membraneinstallation slit (3200) consists of the abutting edges of adjacentsections that contact each other.

Herbicide Layer (4000)

In another embodiment, the barrier system (1000) comprises of a barriermat (2000) and an herbicide layer (4000), as seen in FIGS. 18-29, andmay also include the skirting membrane (3000). All of the disclosurerelated to the skirting membrane (3000) applies equally to the herbicidelayer (4000), but with element numbers in the 4000 series rather thanthe 3000 series. All of the disclosure will not be repeated, but isincorporated by reference with 4000 series element numbers in lieu of3000 series element numbers, and the words “herbicide layer” in lieu of“skirting membrane.” The herbicide layer (4000) maybe composed of, butnot limited to, cloth, or an organic polymer that is impregnated with anherbicide to kill, or suppress growth, of vegetation located under theherbicide layer (4000). The herbicide maybe, but not limited to,glyphosate compounds, acetochlor compounds, amitrole compounds, atrazinecompounds, propanil compounds, and/or any other vegetation suppressioncompounds.

Various anchoring devices such as, but limited to, stakes, spikes,staples maybe used to anchor the barrier system (1000) to the ground.This provides the added benefits of preventing the barrier system (1000)from moving due to wind, high water, and deflection caused by the mower.In one embodiment the barrier mat (2000) includes at least two anchorapertures located on opposite sides of the barrier mat installation slit(2200), while in a further embodiment each of the anchor apertures arelocated a distance from the barrier mat installation slit (2200) that isno more than the barrier mat aperture diameter (2120). In anotherembodiment the length of each anchoring device is at least 50% of thebarrier mat aperture diameter (2120), while in a further embodiment theyare at least 75% of the barrier mat aperture diameter (2120).

Numerous alterations, modifications, and variations of the preferredembodiments disclosed herein will be apparent to those skilled in theart and they are all anticipated and contemplated to be within thespirit and scope of the application. For example, although specificembodiments have been described in detail, those with skill in the artwill understand that the preceding embodiments and variations can bemodified to incorporate various types of substitute and or additional oralternative materials, relative arrangement of elements, and dimensionalconfigurations. Accordingly, even though only few variations aredescribed herein, it is to be understood that the practice of suchadditional modifications and variations and the equivalents thereof, arewithin the spirit and scope of the invention.

I claim:
 1. A mower path assistance system (1000) to encircle anobstacle projecting from a ground surface, comprising, a barrier mat(2000) formed with a barrier mat aperture (2100) enclosed by the barriermat (2000) and having a barrier mat aperture diameter (2120), aperimeter edge, and a barrier mat installation slit (2200) extendingfrom the perimeter edge to the barrier mat aperture (2100), wherein thebarrier mat (2000) is deformable around the barrier mat installationslit (2200) to create a pathway through which the obstacle may pass fromthe perimeter to the barrier mat aperture (2100); the barrier mat (2000)having at least a barrier mat sinistral proximal edge (2320), a barriermat dextral proximal edge (2330), a barrier mat sinistral distal edge(2340), and a barrier mat dextral distal edge (2350), wherein a barriermat sinistral distal edge axis intersects a barrier dextral distal edgeaxis at a barrier mat sinistral distal edge to dextral distal edge angle(2460), and a barrier mat sinistral proximal edge axis intersects abarrier dextral proximal edge axis at a barrier mat sinistral proximaledge to dextral proximal edge angle (2470), and at least one of thebarrier mat sinistral distal edge to dextral distal edge angle (2460)and the barrier mat sinistral proximal edge to dextral proximal edgeangle (2470) is obtuse and at least 100 degrees and no more than 170degrees; the barrier mat (2000) has a barrier mat top surface (2360), abarrier mat bottom surface (2370), and a barrier mat thickness (2380)that is at least 0.25″; and the barrier mat (2000) is formed of aflexible water impermeable material.
 2. The system of claim 1, whereinthe barrier mat sinistral proximal edge (2320) has a barrier matsinistral proximal edge x-coordinate length (2322) and a barrier matsinistral proximal edge y-coordinate length (2324), the barrier matdextral proximal edge (2330) has a barrier mat dextral proximal edgex-coordinate length (2332) and a barrier mat dextral proximal edgey-coordinate length (2334), the barrier mat sinistral distal edge (2340)has a barrier mat sinistral distal edge x-coordinate length (2342) and abarrier mat sinistral distal edge y-coordinate length (2344), and thebarrier mat dextral distal edge (2350) has a barrier mat dextral distaledge x-coordinate length (2352) and a barrier mat dextral distal edgey-coordinate length (2354), wherein at least one of the following aretrue: a) the barrier mat sinistral proximal edge x-coordinate length(2322) is at least 50% greater than the barrier mat sinistral proximaledge y-coordinate length (2324), and the barrier mat sinistral distaledge x-coordinate length (2342) is at least 50% greater than the barriermat sinistral distal edge y-coordinate length (2344); and b) the barriermat dextral proximal edge x-coordinate length (2332) is at least 50%greater than the barrier mat dextral proximal edge y-coordinate length(2334), and the barrier mat dextral distal edge x-coordinate length(2352) is at least 50% greater than the barrier mat dextral distal edgey-coordinate length (2354).
 3. The system of claim 1, wherein at leastone of the following are true: a) the barrier mat sinistral proximaledge x-coordinate length (2322) is 50-200% greater than the barrier matsinistral proximal edge y-coordinate length (2324), and the barrier matsinistral distal edge x-coordinate length (2342) is 50-200% greater thanthe barrier mat sinistral distal edge y-coordinate length (2344); and b)the barrier mat dextral proximal edge x-coordinate length (2332) is50-200% greater than the barrier mat dextral proximal edge y-coordinatelength (2334), and the barrier mat dextral distal edge x-coordinatelength (2352) is 50-200% greater than the barrier mat dextral distaledge y-coordinate length (2354).
 4. The system of claim 1, wherein atleast one of the following are true: a) the barrier mat sinistralproximal edge x-coordinate length (2322) is greater than the aperturediameter (2120) and the barrier mat sinistral proximal edge y-coordinatelength (2324) is less than the aperture diameter (2120), and the barriermat sinistral distal edge x-coordinate length (2342) greater than theaperture diameter (2120) and the barrier mat sinistral distal edgey-coordinate length (2344) is less than the aperture diameter (2120);and b) the barrier mat dextral proximal edge x-coordinate length (2332)is greater than the aperture diameter (2120) and the barrier mat dextralproximal edge y-coordinate length (2334) is less than the aperturediameter (2120), and the barrier mat dextral distal edge x-coordinatelength (2352) is greater than the aperture diameter (2120) and thebarrier mat dextral distal edge y-coordinate length (2354) is less thanthe aperture diameter (2120).
 5. The system of claim 1, wherein at leasttwo of the barrier mat sinistral proximal edge x-coordinate length(2322), the barrier mat dextral proximal edge x-coordinate length(2332), the barrier mat sinistral distal edge x-coordinate length(2342), the barrier mat dextral distal edge x-coordinate length (2352)are substantially equal.
 6. The system of claim 1, wherein at least oneof the barrier mat sinistral distal edge to dextral distal edge angle(2460) and the barrier mat sinistral proximal edge to dextral proximaledge angle (2470) is no more than 150 degrees.
 7. The system of claim 1,further including a barrier mat sinistral edge (2300), having a barriermat sinistral edge length (2305) that is at least 15% of the aperturediameter (2120), and a barrier mat dextral edge (2310) substantiallyparallel to the barrier mat sinistral edge (2300), having a barrier matdextral edge length (2315) that is at least 15% of the aperture diameter(2120).
 8. The system of claim 7, wherein the barrier mat sinistral edgelength (2305) is 15-90% of the aperture diameter (2120), and the barriermat dextral edge length (2315) is 15-90% of the aperture diameter(2120).
 9. The system of claim 1, wherein the barrier mat (2000) has anaspect ratio of a maximum length divided by a maximum width that is1.5-5.0.
 10. The system of claim 1, wherein the barrier mat installationslit (2200) has a length that is 25-100% of the aperture diameter(2120), and the barrier mat thickness (2380) is no more than 1.25″. 11.A mower path assistance system (1000) to encircle an obstacle projectingfrom a ground surface, comprising, a barrier mat (2000) formed with abarrier mat aperture (2100) enclosed by the barrier mat (2000) andhaving a barrier mat aperture diameter (2120), a perimeter edge, and abarrier mat installation slit (2200) extending from the perimeter edgeto the barrier mat aperture (2100), wherein the barrier mat (2000) isdeformable around the barrier mat installation slit (2200) to create apathway through which the obstacle may pass from the perimeter to thebarrier mat aperture (2100); the barrier mat (2000) having at least abarrier mat sinistral proximal edge (2320), a barrier mat dextralproximal edge (2330), a barrier mat sinistral distal edge (2340), and abarrier mat dextral distal edge (2350), wherein a barrier mat sinistraldistal edge axis intersects a barrier dextral distal edge axis at abarrier mat sinistral distal edge to dextral distal edge angle (2460), abarrier mat sinistral proximal edge axis intersects a barrier dextralproximal edge axis at a barrier mat sinistral proximal edge to dextralproximal edge angle (2470), and at least one of the barrier matsinistral distal edge to dextral distal edge angle (2460) and thebarrier mat sinistral proximal edge to dextral proximal edge angle(2470) is obtuse; and wherein the barrier mat sinistral proximal edge(2320) has a barrier mat sinistral proximal edge x-coordinate length(2322) and a barrier mat sinistral proximal edge y-coordinate length(2324), the barrier mat dextral proximal edge (2330) has a barrier matdextral proximal edge x-coordinate length (2332) and a barrier matdextral proximal edge y-coordinate length (2334), the barrier matsinistral distal edge (2340) has a barrier mat sinistral distal edgex-coordinate length (2342) and a barrier mat sinistral distal edgey-coordinate length (2344), and the barrier mat dextral distal edge(2350) has a barrier mat dextral distal edge x-coordinate length (2352)and a barrier mat dextral distal edge y-coordinate length (2354),wherein at least one of the following are true: a) the barrier matsinistral proximal edge x-coordinate length (2322) is at least 50%greater than the barrier mat sinistral proximal edge y-coordinate length(2324), and the barrier mat sinistral distal edge x-coordinate length(2342) is at least 50% greater than the barrier mat sinistral distaledge y-coordinate length (2344); and b) the barrier mat dextral proximaledge x-coordinate length (2332) is at least 50% greater than the barriermat dextral proximal edge y-coordinate length (2334), and the barriermat dextral distal edge x-coordinate length (2352) is at least 50%greater than the barrier mat dextral distal edge y-coordinate length(2354).
 12. The system of claim 11, wherein at least two of thefollowing are true: a) the barrier mat sinistral proximal edgex-coordinate length (2322) is 50-200% greater than the barrier matsinistral proximal edge y-coordinate length (2324); b) the barrier matsinistral distal edge x-coordinate length (2342) is 50-200% greater thanthe barrier mat sinistral distal edge y-coordinate length (2344); c) thebarrier mat dextral proximal edge x-coordinate length (2332) is 50-200%greater than the barrier mat dextral proximal edge y-coordinate length(2334); and d) the barrier mat dextral distal edge x-coordinate length(2352) is 50-200% greater than the barrier mat dextral distal edgey-coordinate length (2354).
 13. The system of claim 12, wherein at leastone of the following are true: a) the barrier mat sinistral proximaledge x-coordinate length (2322) is greater than the aperture diameter(2120) and the barrier mat sinistral proximal edge y-coordinate length(2324) is less than the aperture diameter (2120), and the barrier matsinistral distal edge x-coordinate length (2342) is greater than theaperture diameter (2120) and the barrier mat sinistral distal edgey-coordinate length (2344) is less than the aperture diameter (2120);and b) the barrier mat dextral proximal edge x-coordinate length (2332)is greater than the aperture diameter (2120) and the barrier mat dextralproximal edge y-coordinate length (2334) is less than the aperturediameter (2120), and the barrier mat dextral distal edge x-coordinatelength (2352) is greater than the aperture diameter (2120) and thebarrier mat dextral distal edge y-coordinate length (2354) is less thanthe aperture diameter (2120).
 14. The system of claim 11, wherein atleast two of the barrier mat sinistral proximal edge x-coordinate length(2322), the barrier mat dextral proximal edge x-coordinate length(2332), the barrier mat sinistral distal edge x-coordinate length(2342), the barrier mat dextral distal edge x-coordinate length (2352)are substantially equal, and at least one of the barrier mat sinistraldistal edge to dextral distal edge angle (2460) and the barrier matsinistral proximal edge to dextral proximal edge angle (2470) is atleast 100 degrees and no more than 170 degrees.
 15. The system of claim11, wherein the barrier mat installation slit (2200) has a length thatis 25-100% of the aperture diameter (2120).
 16. A mower path assistancesystem (1000) to encircle an obstacle projecting from a ground surface,comprising, a barrier mat (2000) formed with a barrier mat aperture(2100) enclosed by the barrier mat (2000) and having a barrier mataperture diameter (2120), a perimeter edge, and a barrier matinstallation slit (2200) extending from the perimeter edge to thebarrier mat aperture (2100), wherein the barrier mat (2000) isdeformable around the barrier mat installation slit (2200) to create apathway through which the obstacle may pass from the perimeter to thebarrier mat aperture (2100); the barrier mat (2000) having at least abarrier mat sinistral proximal edge (2320), a barrier mat dextralproximal edge (2330), a barrier mat sinistral distal edge (2340), and abarrier mat dextral distal edge (2350), wherein a barrier mat sinistraldistal edge axis intersects a barrier dextral distal edge axis at abarrier mat sinistral distal edge to dextral distal edge angle (2460),and a barrier mat sinistral proximal edge axis intersects a barrierdextral proximal edge axis at a barrier mat sinistral proximal edge todextral proximal edge angle (2470), and at least one of the barrier matsinistral distal edge to dextral distal edge angle (2460) and thebarrier mat sinistral proximal edge to dextral proximal edge angle(2470) is obtuse; the barrier mat sinistral proximal edge (2320) has abarrier mat sinistral proximal edge x-coordinate length (2322) and abarrier mat sinistral proximal edge y-coordinate length (2324), thebarrier mat dextral proximal edge (2330) has a barrier mat dextralproximal edge x-coordinate length (2332) and a barrier mat dextralproximal edge y-coordinate length (2334), the barrier mat sinistraldistal edge (2340) has a barrier mat sinistral distal edge x-coordinatelength (2342) and a barrier mat sinistral distal edge y-coordinatelength (2344), and the barrier mat dextral distal edge (2350) has abarrier mat dextral distal edge x-coordinate length (2352) and a barriermat dextral distal edge y-coordinate length (2354); wherein at least oneof the following are true: a) the barrier mat sinistral proximal edgex-coordinate length (2322) is greater than the aperture diameter (2120)and the barrier mat sinistral proximal edge y-coordinate length (2324)is less than the aperture diameter (2120), and the barrier mat sinistraldistal edge x-coordinate length (2342) greater than the aperturediameter (2120) and the barrier mat sinistral distal edge y-coordinatelength (2344) is less than the aperture diameter (2120); and b) thebarrier mat dextral proximal edge x-coordinate length (2332) is greaterthan the aperture diameter (2120) and the barrier mat dextral proximaledge y-coordinate length (2334) is less than the aperture diameter(2120), and the barrier mat dextral distal edge x-coordinate length(2352) is greater than the aperture diameter (2120) and the barrier matdextral distal edge y-coordinate length (2354) is less than the aperturediameter (2120).
 17. The system of claim 16, wherein at least one of thefollowing are true: a) the barrier mat sinistral proximal edgex-coordinate length (2322) is at least 50% greater than the barrier matsinistral proximal edge y-coordinate length (2324), and the barrier matsinistral distal edge x-coordinate length (2342) is at least 50% greaterthan the barrier mat sinistral distal edge y-coordinate length (2344);and b) the barrier mat dextral proximal edge x-coordinate length (2332)is at least 50% greater than the barrier mat dextral proximal edgey-coordinate length (2334), and the barrier mat dextral distal edgex-coordinate length (2352) is at least 50% greater than the barrier matdextral distal edge y-coordinate length (2354).
 18. The system of claim16, wherein at least two of the barrier mat sinistral proximal edgex-coordinate length (2322), the barrier mat dextral proximal edgex-coordinate length (2332), the barrier mat sinistral distal edgex-coordinate length (2342), the barrier mat dextral distal edgex-coordinate length (2352) are substantially equal, and at least one ofthe barrier mat sinistral distal edge to dextral distal edge angle(2460) and the barrier mat sinistral proximal edge to dextral proximaledge angle (2470) is at least 100 degrees and no more than 170 degrees.19. The system of claim 16, wherein the barrier mat installation slit(2200) has a length that is 25-100% of the aperture diameter (2120). 20.The system of claim 16, wherein at least one of the barrier matsinistral distal edge to dextral distal edge angle (2460) and thebarrier mat sinistral proximal edge to dextral proximal edge angle(2470) is at least 100 degrees and no more than 170 degrees.